U.S. v. Rogers, 1st Cir. Mar. 25, 2008
06-2532 U.S. v. Rogers
Before Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges, and Oberdorfer,1 Senior District Judge.
OBERDORFER, Senior District Judge. Roy Lewis Rogers appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). He challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the police exceeded the scope of their search warrant authorizing them to search for “photos of [a minor child]” when they seized and later viewed a videotape. He also contends that pursuant to § 5G1.3(b) of the federal Sentencing Guidelines, the district court should have ordered his entire federal sentence of imprisonment to run concurrently to his undischarged state sentence. Finding no error in the denial of Rogers’ motion to suppress or at sentencing, we affirm. … U.S. v. Rogers.
- Of the District of Columbia, sitting by designation. [↩]
