U.S. v. Maupin, 11th Cir. Mar. 24, 2008

07-1334 U.S. v. Maupin
Before ANDERSON, BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Todd Maupin appeals his 240-month and 480-month sentences imposed following his guilty plea to two child pornography counts, both in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A. Maupin asserts the district court erred in enhancing his sentences based on its determination that a 1991 nolo contendere plea with adjudication withheld to Florida child pornography charges was a prior conviction warranting a sentencing enhancement under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b)(1) and (b)(2). We conclude the district court did not err in enhancing Maupin’s sentences, and affirm. … U.S. v. Maupin.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.